马斯克与OpenAI的对决：是时候迎接ClosedAI了吗？

【埃隆·马斯克 vs. OpenAI ----> ClosedAI？】

OpenAI 戏剧第 2 季正在变得疯狂！ 以下是《AI 巨人之战》或马斯克 vs. OpenAI 的完整摘要：

这一切都始于大概10年前萨姆·奥尔特曼 (Sam Altman) 向埃隆·马斯克 (Elon Musk) 提出建立一个开源非营利组织以对抗谷歌等科技巨头主导地位的想法。 马斯克同意了，并慷慨地资助了该实体（现称为 OpenAI），金额达 4500 万至 1 亿美元。

然而，后来人们发现，在维持非营利性努力的同时与谷歌的庞大资源竞争几乎是不可能的。

随后，马斯克提议掌舵并获得 OpenAI 的多数控制权，将其转变为一个营利性实体，又名 ClosedAI。 OpenAI 拒绝了这一提议，不愿妥协其创立原则。

随后，埃隆建议 OpenAI 应纳入特斯拉旗下，由他的电动汽车公司利用与 OpenAI 合作开发的自动驾驶技术为人工智能工作提供资金。 OpenAI 再次拒绝了。

由于对这些拒绝感到沮丧，马斯克与 OpenAI 分道扬镳，并将自己的努力转向特斯拉和他自己的人工智能企业，目标是在营利环境中与谷歌竞争。 不过，他继续资助 OpenAI。

与此同时，OpenAI 的领导者萨姆·奥尔特曼 (Sam Altman) 和格雷格·布罗克曼 (Greg Brockman) 继续推进将公司转变为营利性实体的计划。 他们与微软合作，诞生了 GPT-4。 这种合作关系实际上使微软成为 OpenAI 技术的事实上的所有者，这一发展引起了业内许多人的关注。

尽管发生了这些巨大的变化，OpenAI 仍然保留了原来的名称和创始使命宣言，这一决定深深困扰了马斯克，他认为这与公司新发现的商业抱负相矛盾。

当马斯克对 OpenAI 提起诉讼，指责该公司背叛其创立原则时，紧张局势达到了沸点。 在一场激烈的交流中，OpenAI 予以反击，称马斯克为伪君子，指出他自己参与了营利性、闭源人工智能实体，尽管最初支持 OpenAI 的开源、非营利前提。

马斯克则回击，质疑 OpenAI 在转型为营利模式后为何没有更名，实际上是指责该公司在获得微软资助的同时，伪装成开源、非营利实体。

随着这个传奇的继续展开，开源、非营利人工智能实体曾经的共同愿景已经让位于自我、意识形态和商业利益的高风险冲突。

这场战斗的结果不仅将塑造AI的未来，也将决定OpenAI的命运和AGI的未来。

剧情在继续

【Elon Musk vs. OpenAI ----> ClosedAI?】

OpenAI Drama Season 2 is getting wild! Here's a complete summary of The Clash of AI Titans, or Musk vs. OpenAI:

It all started when Sam Altman approached Elon Musk with the idea of building an open-source, non-profit organization to counter the dominance of tech giants like Google. Musk agreed and generously funded the entity, now known as OpenAI, to the tune of million to 0 million.

However, it later became clear that competing against Google's vast resources while sustaining a non-profit endeavor was nearly impossible.

Musk then proposed to take the helm and gain majority control of OpenAI, transforming it into a for-profit entity aka ClosedAI. OpenAI declined this offer, unwilling to compromise its founding principles.

Elon then suggested that OpenAI should be brought under the umbrella of Tesla, with his EV company bankrolling the AI efforts using self-driving technology developed in collaboration with OpenAI. Again, OpenAI declined.

Frustrated by these rejections, Musk parted ways with OpenAI and redirected his efforts toward Tesla and his own AI venture with the goal of competing with Google in a for-profit environment. However, he continued to fund OpenAI.

Meanwhile, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, the leaders of OpenAI, forged ahead with their plans to transition the company into a for-profit entity. They partnered with Microsoft, giving birth to GPT-4. This partnership effectively made Microsoft the de facto owner of OpenAI's technology, a development that raised the eyebrows of many in the industry.

Despite these seismic shifts, OpenAI retained its original name and founding mission statement, a decision that deeply disturbed Musk, who saw it as a contradiction to the company's newfound commercial aspirations.

Tensions reached a boiling point when Musk filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing the company of betraying its founding principles. In a heated exchange, OpenAI countered by labeling Musk a hypocrite, pointing to his own involvement in for-profit, closed-source AI entities, despite initially endorsing OpenAI's open-source, non-profit premise.

Musk, in turn, fired back, questioning why OpenAI had not changed its name after transitioning to a for-profit model, effectively accusing the company of masquerading as an open-source, non-profit entity while being bankrolled by Microsoft.

As this saga continues to unfold, the once-shared vision of an open-source, non-profit AI entity has given way to a high-stakes clash of egos, ideologies, and commercial interests.

The outcome of this battle will not only shape the future of AI but also determine the fate of OpenAI and the future of AGI.

Drama continues